Quantcast
Khalique’s attorney cross examines witness who exposed mail-in ballot handling at campaign office | Paterson Times

Khalique’s attorney cross examines witness who exposed mail-in ballot handling at campaign office

titu-miah

Councilman Shahin Khalique’s attorney cross examined Titu Miah, a witness who testified to handling more than a dozen mail-in ballot at Khalique’s campaign headquarter, in the 2nd Ward election fraud trial on Wednesday morning.

Khalique’s attorney John Carbone raised doubts about Miah’s testimony. Miah previously said he witnessed a campaign worker of Khalique’s Joyed Rohim completing documents at the campaign office while he was tasked with completing 13 mail-in voters certification at the direction of campaign staff.

“Did you see what they were filling out?” asked Carbone.

“No,” replied Miah. He was then provided a stack of certificate of mail-in voter, flaps attached to mail-in ballots, to examine and find any that were completed by Rohim, who Khalique appointed to the Paterson Board of Adjustment.

Did you find Rohim’s name? asked Carbone after three minutes.

“No,” responded Miah (pictured on witness stand).

Carbone then told the court there may be a conflict of interest in Passaic City-based attorney Adrian Bermudez representing Miah. Bermudez was involved in a case in which a homeowner accused Khalique’s brother Shelim Khalique of racketeering in a lawsuit for his role in an alleged housing scam.

“What conflict of interest?” asked Bermudez when the attorneys gathered for a sidebar with the judge. “I find that highly insulting.”

Carbone said Bermudez was involved in litigation “against the Khalique family.” Bermudez said he did not file the lawsuit against Khalique’s brother. He did file papers in the case. Carbone pointed to a letter Bermudez wrote to the state making the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs aware of the alleged scam that targeted property owners with underwater homes in Paterson.

Bermudez said he has withdrawn the case against Khalique’s brother.

Carbone also said Shamim Ahmed, a notary, who works as an assistant for Bermudez notarized statements witnesses provided to a private investigator hired by former councilman Mohammed Akhtaruzzaman’s campaign.

The notary was not working for Bermudez when he notarized the statements the court was told. He notarized them on his own time. Judge Ernest Caposela remarked Bermudez doesn’t know what Ahmed does on his free time.

Carbone also asked how Miah came to select Bermudez as his attorney. Miah said his uncle’s friend connected him to Bermudez’s office. Carbone also asked him how he was paying the attorney or who was paying. Miah did not provide a definitive answer.

Asked if he considered other lawyers, Miah said he had a brief meeting with Paterson-based lawyer Richard Baldi. He said Baldi told him not to testify in their brief meeting.

Under questioning, Miah said his uncle supported Akhtaruzzaman in the election.

Akhtaruzzaman’s attorney Susan Champion objected to Carbone’s questioning arguing the questions were not relevant to the case.

Miah was then questioned by deputy attorney General Alan Stephens. Stephens went over the 13 mail-in ballots Miah handled case by case.

Stephens asked if he saw the voters for whom he completed flaps. Miah replied in the negative. Stephens asked if the voters signed the mail-in ballots in front of him. Miah replied in the negative.

“What kind of assistance did you provide and to whom?” asked Stephens.

“I just signed the papers he [Jwel Khalique] gave me,” testified Miah. At one point Miah was asked by Carbone if he maintained the secrecy of the ballot while handling them.

Miah said he did. He said he did not know which candidate was picked in the mail-in ballots he handled.

Email: jay@patersontimes.com

Related posts

Top