Paterson looks to lease old church building for $2.1 million to house two schools | Paterson Times

Paterson looks to lease old church building for $2.1 million to house two schools


The school board is considering a five-year lease agreement that will cost $2.1 million for the old Lagarde Academy building on Broadway. The lease will allow the district to house two of its schools – the Young Men’s Academy and Stars Academy – which are in rented spaces to a single building.

Under the lease agreement, the district will pay $228,320 for the first year, $426,000 for the second year, and $472,556 for each subsequent year. Lease for the 31,000 square feet facility runs from Aug. 1, 2018 through Jun. 31, 2023.

The Young Men’s Academy, housed at a building in Prospect Park, will be moved to the leased space in the first year. In the second year, Stars Academy will follow. This consolidation will allow the district to end two lease agreements.

The lease agreement was up for a vote on Wednesday night. However, school board members said they have yet to review the agreement and needed more time before taking a vote.

“I just got this. So, I really haven’t had the opportunity to delve through it and actually understand it,” said school board member Kenneth Simmons. He asked Bob Murray, attorney for the Paterson Public Schools, for an overview of the lease agreement with Michael John’s LLC. which is owned by former city school teacher Michael Sico and his father former district assistant superintendent John Sico.

Murray said the developers will be responsible for the build out and local taxes. This is also not a triple net lease which means the developers will be responsible for building repairs. Both Sicos said the building at 535 Broadway has to be gutted out and renovated for $1 million.

The father and son, who operate the Math, Science, Technology, Science (M.E.T.S.) Charter School of Jersey City, purchased the building for $350,000 in Oct. 2017. Before buying the building, the Sicos were in talks to lease the space to the district. Officials said the possibility of the district leasing the space which will have 18 classrooms and 51 parking spaces goes back to Sept. 2017.

“Is it time sensitive?” asked board member Nakima Redmon.

Acting superintendent Eileen Shafer replied in the affirmative. “As soon as it gets approved the landlord will start the work,” she said. Developers have to secure permits from the city and have the building ready in eight months.

School board member Manny Martinez asked whether this will produce savings.

“Right now, it will be awash,” said Shafer.

School board president Oshin Castillo allowed the Sicos to addresses the board on the lease agreement.

A bizarre scene unfolded. Both the father and son aggressively pushed for the school board to approve the agreement.

Both men took issue with the board taking a vote on the lease next week.

“It will be impossible to have the building ready by August 1,” John Sico, who previously worked at the district for 37 years, told the board. “There’s a lot of variables when you’re doing construction. You have a deal of a lifetime. It’s built to your specifications.”

“We can’t wait seven days. If you table it you may not have a deal,” said John Sico.

“The offer was valid for tonight. We’re making no promises for next week,” added Michael Sico. He said the district will save money by having a single nurse for both schools. It will also save on transportation, and maintenance.

Savings from nursing services won’t materialize until the second year.

Savings from transportation is not likely to be a great sum. All students of Stars Academy, which educates special needs children, must be provided transportation, according to officials.

Not all students of the Young Men’s Academy receive transportation. Even if transportation is eliminated for every student that’s not likely to produce a significant amount in savings due to the small number of students.

School board members Flavio Rivera and Redmon pushed back on the hard sell.

“I get it, you’re in the business of selling buildings. We’re in the business to govern. We have to do our due diligence,” said Redmon.

“This is not the way we do business here,” said Rivera. He said the lease was not vetted through the fiscal committee. “It will be irresponsible on my part to vote on a five-year lease, where we’re allocating few million dollars, without discussing it with my colleagues and asking the questions that need to be asked.”

Both Sicos said the school board should have been better informed of the agreement by their attorneys. Lease agreement was undergoing revision as recent as this weekend, said Murray.

The building which was constructed in the late 1800s has three other offers from a parochial school, a day care, and a charter school, according to the Sicos.

The school district and the developers were brought together by pastor Michael McDuffie. He was present with the developers on Wednesday night.

“It’s a sweet deal,” said McDuffie.

Email: [email protected]

This report was updated on Jan. 18, 2018 at 3:10 p.m.

  • MarquinhoGaucho

    why lease new buildings when you have a building on Church st which is empty? Oh yeah the owner is former district assistant superintendent John Sico. Give Oshin castilo a no show job and she'll vote in favour. Soprano state politics at its finest

    • Chrisforpaterson

      Looks like Sicos know what they are talking about. They have their valid points. Instead of paying for two building Paterson BOE will be paying only for one. This way we will save a lot of money for our kids. We will not be paying transportation cost, leasing cost for two buildings, and even the parking will not be an issue. Plus kids will get an absolutely new building. From what I remember from previous years we are paying close to $ 5- 6 million for other schools, which is a triple cost compared to the new proposal. Curious why Board is paying a lot more for lease, transportation to someone else and doesn't want to move kids to Paterson. As a taxpayer I vote for it. Let's finally give our kids something good!

      • MarquinhoGaucho

        You miss the fact that you can still fit both schools at the old BOE building on Church street they have parking there and another lot on the corner and it is along several bus routes for the kids who dont get transportation (the STARS kids are required to have transportation as the article states) . The district would save $2.1 million in lease money since they own the building already. This is another politically motivated deal to get an unrentable property (really who wants to relocate to drug/violence plagued Broadway?) off the developers hands, just like the EOHS "building" at 77 Ellison which the district never utilized and got stuck with the bill thanks to the Evil Axis of Torres/Evans. Another red flag as the article states is " Both the father and son aggressively pushed for the school board to approve the agreement. Both men took issue with the board taking a vote on the lease next week." You know when a pushy salesman tries a high pressure sales tactic it cant be good for you. "caveat emptor"-Let the buyer beware. Also as a Paterson resident and taxpayer with 2 children in the system, this smells rotten to the core.