Paterson debates demolishing 28 vacant buildings | Paterson Times

Paterson debates demolishing 28 vacant buildings


Mayor Andre Sayegh’s administration is looking to demolish 28 vacant and abandoned buildings that have been deemed a danger to the public, but has run into opposition in the City Council.

Council members have delayed a vote on a measure to solicit bids to demolish the private properties.

“How does the taxpayer get compensated for knocking down these properties?” asked William McKoy, 3rd Ward councilman, who has vehemently opposed the demolitions. “What is the logic of reducing the value of the property by knocking down the structure and having a liability that’s higher than the asset?”

McKoy explained a lot with a structure is worth more than empty land. He pointed out, even after demolishing the structure, the land will remain in private hands, barring the city from developing the site.

Economic development director Michael Powell argued the blighted properties present a public safety problem and reduce the value of neighboring homes.

“Many of the properties here already have squatters,” said Powell last Tuesday.

Municipal officials said numerous notices have gone out to the owners of the properties to repair their buildings. But the owners have failed to take steps to fix them.

Vacant buildings are often used by drug addicts. Squatters often start fires to keep themselves warm and at times ignite the entire building.

“If we tear it down, at least we will make the neighbors feel a little bit safer in their own neighborhoods,” added business administrator Vaughn McKoy.

Empty lots create problems in neighborhoods as well. Tall weeds. Dumping. And racoons are some of the problems that emerge from empty lots, said Michael Jackson, 1st Ward councilman.

“If we’re creating empty lots, it’s going to create more blight and more dumping,” said Jackson.

Councilman McKoy has argued some of the properties, like 238 Summer Street, could be salvaged.

“Why not move to foreclose on these properties?” asked the councilman.

“The foreclosure process could take a very long time. We’re talking about 18 to 36 months for some of these properties,” said the business administrator.

It may be cheaper to take ownership of the properties than to demolish them, said councilman McKoy.

The city doesn’t have the information to determine which is cheaper, said the business administrator. Bids from vendors will provide the information needed to make that determination, he said.

His argument convinced the council to carry the item for a possible vote on Tuesday night. Previously, the council refused to consider the bid solicitation measure for a vote.

Properties slated for demolition:

  • 101 Holsman St.
  • 61 Ryle Ave.
  • 199 12th Ave.
  • 29 Stout St.
  • 83 Franklin St.
  • 99 Pearl St.
  • 98 Jefferson St.
  • 226 17th Ave.
  • 126 Straight St.
  • 887 Madison Ave.
  • 173 Slater St.
  • 314 Broadway
  • 68 East Main St.
  • 113 Marshall St.
  • 159 Redwood Ave.
  • 316 Broadway
  • 238-240 Summer St
  • 111 Belmont Ave.
  • 202 Mill St.
  • 181 Pearl St.
  • 208 North 1st St.
  • 254-258 Clinton St
  • 13 Pearl St.
  • 11 Sherman Ave.
  • 65 Mercer St.
  • 55 Pennington St.
  • 977-979 Madison Ave.
  • 111 Jersey Street.

Email: [email protected]

Related posts

  • Miss jamaica

    I must agree with the councilman this time. I believe the city must contact these home owners. Certified letters must be mail out giving these home owner time to improve their homes, if no responds to the letters them you move to demolish.
    These houses are a breathing ground for fire in the winter, creating big issues for the well maintained property next one of them.
    This is my opinion.