Trump mentions voter fraud in Paterson, again, to attack mail-in voting | Paterson Times

Trump mentions voter fraud in Paterson, again, to attack mail-in voting


President Donald Trump cited widespread voter fraud in Paterson, again, to attack mail-in voting during a briefing at the White House Rose Garden on Tuesday.

“I’m very worried about mail-in voting because I think it’s subject to tremendous fraud and being rigged. You see that Paterson, New Jersey, where I believe it was 20% of the vote was fraudulent,” said Trump. “You’ll have tremendous fraud if you do these mail-in ballots.”

Trump is referring to the total number of votes rejected in the May 12 municipal election. 13,556 votes were counted in the six ward races and 3,204 were rejected, according to Passaic County Board of Elections data.

Trump said he likes absentee ballots because voters have to go through a process to obtain them. In New Jersey absentee and mail-in ballots are the same thing. But even when voters go through the process of filling out a form and obtaining a mail-in or absentee ballot fraud is possible.

In 2016, there was widespread voter fraud in the 2nd Ward election. A judge tossed out 22 mail-in votes because of fraud and irregularities. In that election voters had to go through the process Trump described to obtain the vote-by-mail ballots.

New Jersey deputy attorney general Alan Stephens during the 2nd Ward election fraud trial stated “fraud was afoot” in the election. But no one was prosecuted. That wasn’t the case in 2020.

New Jersey attorney general Gurbir Grewal charged four men for voter fraud. He charged councilman Michael Jackson and councilman-elect Alex Mendez. He also charged two of then-councilman Shahin Khalique’s campaign workers, including his brother.

Khalique’s team was accused of committing voter fraud in the 2016 election that led to a nearly year-long trial. Khalique ultimately prevailed in the case.

Trump appeared to suggest the chances of fraud increases when governors hold all mail-in vote elections.

Political strategists in Paterson had warned governor Phil Murphy’s decision to hold the all vote-by mail election on May 12 because of the coronavirus pandemic would lead to widespread fraud. Many of them were vindicated when reports emerged of campaign workers harvesting ballots for their candidates.

“If you take a look at all of the unbelievable fraud that’s been involved with mail-in voting over the last even a short period of well — but look at Paterson, New Jersey. It was a massive error and a massive miscalculation and there was incredible fraud,” said Trump. “Look at the City Council and what’s happened to it.”

A judge barred Mendez, who is one of the four charged with voter fraud, from assuming the 3rd Ward seat.

Khalique, who had initially won the 2nd Ward seat, found himself tied with his main rival, Mohammed Akhtaruzzaman, after three recounts.

The City Council has been operating with two vacancies since July 1.

Trump had previously tweeted about election fraud in Paterson.

Email: [email protected]

Related posts

  • John Brown

    I disagree with 99% of what this guy
    Says. But this. he's absolutely right.
    It's been going on in Paterson for the
    Past 12 years.

    • Yogi Zuna

      99% of the time? Wow! Perhaps you miscalculated and it's only 95% of the time? :) I disagree with him about 40 to 45% of the time. But in any case, yes he is right this time.

  • John

    Trump is 100% right. The only people that hate Trump are the true racist in America. Remember dont believe the lies that Democrats are for us minorities.

    • TheCarMan

      Correct — to say beforehand that one will pick a black woman as a VP prior to any vetting is clearly racist and sexist. Don't think so? … simply ask yourself if those descriptions don't apply to someone claiming they will NOT pick a woman of color as a VP choice and see how the media reacts.

  • TheCarMan

    One problem with mail-in voting is the timing … even if it were 100% reliable (which it clearly is not) things can happen that can change a person's decision as November 3rd approaches. It could be the result of a debate, a serious accusation, an off-the-cuff comment or skeleton emerging from some closet.